All
Thanks a lot for your work! I've quickly checked (with a limited mobile
terminal) and everything seems fine.
Sorry for being MIA here, but it will probably be for some more time...
All the best for end of the year celebrations.
Cheers,
Arnaud
(sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity)
Le
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:47:13 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > Looks good but (there is always a but :),
> Thanks for the review.
> I added it to nut-client as well (new debdiffs attached).
Thanks, uploaded with this debdiff (to DELAYED/1 in case the
maintainer or the RT want to take a last look).
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 08:19:21PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > I prepared an NMU that should fix both issues. The debdiff against
> > wheezy and the debdiff -w against sid are attached. I will try to get
> > this NMU uploaded soon.
>
> Looks good but (there is always a but :)
Le Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:57:19 +0100,
Ivo De Decker a écrit :
> Hi Laurent and Julien,
Hello
>
> I prepared an NMU that should fix both issues. The debdiff against
> wheezy and the debdiff -w against sid are attached. I will try to get
> this NMU uploaded soon.
Looks good but (there is always a
Hi Laurent and Julien,
If I read the bug history correctly, there are only 2 remaining issues for the
unblock (the rest has been dealt with).
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 19:43:44 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > > > +#
Le Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:33:09 +0100,
Julien Cristau a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 19:43:44 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > > > +# make sure that conffiles are secured and have the correct
> > > > ownerships
> > > > +if [ -d /etc/nut/ ]
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 19:43:44 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> [...]
> > > +# make sure that conffiles are secured and have the correct
> > > ownerships
> > > +if [ -d /etc/nut/ ] ; then
> > > + chown root:nut /etc/nut/
> > > +fi
> > > +for file
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:13:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:50:17 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
> >
> > Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut
> > versioned 2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. Th
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:50:17 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
>
> Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut versioned
> 2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. The change relative to the
> previous version in unstable (2.6.4-2) is
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut versioned
2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. The change relative to the
previous version in unstable (2.6.4-2) is that I have added a preinst
script in nut-client.
For completeness, I attach
I missed to add...
2012/11/26 Arnaud Quette
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> 2012/11/26 Michael Biebl
>
>> On 26.11.2012 01:58, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> >> +if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
>> >> +chown root:nut /var/run/nut
>> >> +chmod 770 /var/run/nut
>> >> +fi
>>
>
th
Hi Michael,
2012/11/26 Michael Biebl
> On 26.11.2012 01:58, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> +if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
> >> +chown root:nut /var/run/nut
> >> +chmod 770 /var/run/nut
> >> +fi
>
> > d /var/run/nut 0770 nut nut - -
>
> A small bug slipped throu
Hi everybody,
sorry for the lag in answering... too many real life issues to deal with.
2012/11/26 Julien Cristau
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 22:42:09 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> > Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:06:52 +0100,
> > Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >
> > > One more question...
> > >
> >
On 26.11.2012 01:58, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> +if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
>> +chown root:nut /var/run/nut
>> +chmod 770 /var/run/nut
>> +fi
> d /var/run/nut 0770 nut nut - -
A small bug slipped through, the correct config would be
d /var/run/nut 0770 roo
On 12.11.2012 13:34, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> 2012/11/11 Laurent Bigonville
>> Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:07:46 +0100,
>> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 21:12:09 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>>>
Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200,
Julien Cristau a écrit :
> +
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 22:43:42 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:07:46 +0100,
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 21:12:09 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >
> > > Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200,
> > > Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > >
> > > >
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 22:42:09 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:06:52 +0100,
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> > One more question...
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 15:36:14 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >
> > > +for file in nut.conf upsmon.conf upssched.conf
Hi again guys,
2012/11/11 Laurent Bigonville
> Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:07:46 +0100,
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 21:12:09 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >
> > > Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200,
> > > Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > >
> > > >
> > > > why is the la
Hi Laurent and Julien,
2012/11/11 Laurent Bigonville
> Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:06:52 +0100,
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> > One more question...
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 15:36:14 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >
> > > +for file in nut.conf upsmon.conf upssched.conf ; do
> > > +
Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:07:46 +0100,
Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 21:12:09 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> > Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200,
> > Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >
> > >
> > > why is the last bit needed?
> > >
>
> I didn't get a reply to the above (wh
Le Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:06:52 +0100,
Julien Cristau a écrit :
> One more question...
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 15:36:14 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> > +for file in nut.conf upsmon.conf upssched.conf ; do
> > +if [ -f /etc/nut/$file ] ; then
> > +chown root:nut /
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 21:12:09 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200,
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> >
> > why is the last bit needed?
> >
I didn't get a reply to the above (why you need adduser nut nut).
> > +if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
> > +c
One more question...
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 15:36:14 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> +for file in nut.conf upsmon.conf upssched.conf ; do
> +if [ -f /etc/nut/$file ] ; then
> +chown root:nut /etc/nut/$file
> +chmod 640 /etc/nut/$file
> +fi
> +do
Le Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:56:11 +0200,
Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> why is the last bit needed?
>
> +if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
> +chown root:nut /var/run/nut
> +chmod 770 /var/run/nut
> +fi
>
> why does the nut user need write access there? And why is this
> created i
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 15:36:14 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi,
>
> Please unblock package nut
>
+if ! getent group nut >/dev/null; then
+ addgroup --quiet --sy
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package nut
This upload fixes several RC bugs and should make the package fit for
the upcoming release.
nut (2.6.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: Stop the
26 matches
Mail list logo
