Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-19 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Okay, I worked it out. New files uploaded to Debian. I assume/hope the chromium folks who filed this bug are on top of any freeze related issues that are in effect. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-19 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Working on packaging. Hit a small snag, most likely something on my end. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-16 Thread James Zern
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Pascal Massimino wrote: > +James > > On Aug 13, 2012 7:54 PM, "Jeff Breidenbach" wrote: >>> >>> As mentioned, we're going to do 0.2.0 very soon after... >> >> >> Well, should we wait for 0.2.0 ? ETA? > > I'd say: yes. ETA is roughly next week. > This has been rele

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-13 Thread Pascal Massimino
+James On Aug 13, 2012 7:54 PM, "Jeff Breidenbach" wrote: >> >> As mentioned, we're going to do 0.2.0 very soon after... > > > Well, should we wait for 0.2.0 ? ETA? I'd say: yes. ETA is roughly next week. >

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-13 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> > As mentioned, we're going to do 0.2.0 very soon after... > Well, should we wait for 0.2.0 ? ETA?

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-13 Thread Pascal Massimino
Hi Jeff, On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Pascal, > > libwebp-0.1.99 bumps the soname from 2 to 3. > Are you SURE you want that and are ready for this to ship? > Soname changes are a big deal out here in packaging land. > well, we must bump it because ABI changed quite

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-13 Thread shawn
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 21:13 -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Pascal, > > libwebp-0.1.99 bumps the soname from 2 to 3. > Are you SURE you want that and are ready for this to ship? > Soname changes are a big deal out here in packaging land. soname bumps are good when they mean that you can coinst

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-12 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Pascal, libwebp-0.1.99 bumps the soname from 2 to 3. Are you SURE you want that and are ready for this to ship? Soname changes are a big deal out here in packaging land. Shawn, I have the package built and ready, awaiting response from Pascal before submitting. -Jeff

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-09 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I'll try to get to it this weekend. NMUs happily accepted also.

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-09 Thread shawn
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 23:37 -0700, Pascal Massimino wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Jeff Breidenbach > wrote: > Pascal, please comment. > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1053655.html > > > > > The Chromiu

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-08 Thread Pascal Massimino
Hi, On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Pascal, please comment. > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1053655.html > The Chromium tree has been refreshed with libwebp-0.2.0-rc1 through: http://codereview.chromium.org/10832153 Expect few

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-08 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Pascal, please comment. http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1053655.html

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

2012-08-08 Thread shawn
Package: libwebp-dev Version: 0.1.3-3 Severity: important It appears chromium needs a newer webp in order to use the libwebp package. Giuseppe: Do you have the exact error you got that led you to do this commit? (pkg-chromium): commit dd01965710e5805772a6878e6d48208cb24c7404 Author: Giuseppe Iucu