On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:57 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The real problems are not related to upgrading/installing/removing. They
> are related to using sgml tools. As far as I understand converting an
> xml file using xmlto should discover some of the issues. Errors that
> point to sgml-base fail
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:14:24AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> So, having procrastinated on this for far too long, I did some tests.
Thanks for looking into this.
> Starting from a freshly debootstrapped squeeze chroot with
> gnome-desktop-environment installed, I added a local repo containin
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 11:43 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm not interested in "you are on sid" so much as "you're upgrading from
> squeeze to wheezy". And considering the amount of bugs this whole thing
> has uncovered (whether in the transition stuff itself, in dpkg, or
> somewhere else) I'm f
Hello,
On 24.12.2012 17:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 09.10.2012 08:10, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:15:32AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 1) Add a pre-dependency on dpkg such that dpkg is already upgraded
> before deconfiguring sg
On 09.10.2012 08:10, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:15:32AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 1) Add a pre-dependency on dpkg such that dpkg is already upgraded
>before deconfiguring sgml-base. This does not guarantee to
solve the
>
[Dropping Adam from CC since he should receive this Mail via the bug
report as well.]
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:44:28PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Apologies if I missed it, but is there somewhere a concise and
> current list of the remaining issues affecting:
I don't think that there is suc
On 06.12.2012 17:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 29.11.2012 13:46, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Will wheezy ship sgml catalogs as configuration files or as
conffiles?
I am explicitly deferring this question to the release managers now.
There is no obviously correct answer, but we can only solve problems
[dropping explicit CCs to people who I know read -release]
On 29.11.2012 13:46, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Will wheezy ship sgml catalogs as configuration files or as
conffiles?
I am explicitly deferring this question to the release managers now.
There is no obviously correct answer, but we can only
Thanks for pinging the issue.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:20:38PM -0500, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Anyway, *someone* should probably do *something* here...
Just what? As far as I can see the most fundamental question has not
received a final answer:
Will wheezy ship sgml catalogs as configuration f
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:56:41 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:23:20AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > Get rid of the triggers and get back to something that actually works.
>>
>> I believe that you are a bit late into this discussion. In
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:43:19AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm not interested in "you are on sid" so much as "you're upgrading from
> squeeze to wheezy". And considering the amount of bugs this whole thing
> has uncovered (whether in the transition stuff itself, in dpkg, or
> somewhere else
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:56:41 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:23:20AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Get rid of the triggers and get back to something that actually works.
>
> I believe that you are a bit late into this discussion. Initially I
> proposed[63] a soluti
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:23:20AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Get rid of the triggers and get back to something that actually works.
I believe that you are a bit late into this discussion. Initially I
proposed[63] a solution not involving triggers in the spirit of minimal
changes. Then Daniel
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:15:32AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > 1) Add a pre-dependency on dpkg such that dpkg is already upgraded
> >before deconfiguring sgml-base. This does not guarantee to solve the
> >issue, because the old dpkg may stil
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 13:13:07 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 4) Your solution?
>
Get rid of the triggers and get back to something that actually works.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 1) Add a pre-dependency on dpkg such that dpkg is already upgraded
>before deconfiguring sgml-base. This does not guarantee to solve the
>issue, because the old dpkg may still be running, but it makes it
>highly unlikely.
IIRC when apt upgrad
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:49:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 22:20:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > In addition a number of people on #-mentors suggested that a
> > Pre-Dependency on dpkg shouldn't be too bad since dpkg should be
> > upgraded early in any case.
>
> S
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 22:20:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In addition a number of people on #-mentors suggested that a
> Pre-Dependency on dpkg shouldn't be too bad since dpkg should be
> upgraded early in any case.
Sounds like a myth to me. Reference?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descri
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:23:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Can you provide a pointer to the dpkg pre-dependency discussion?
To comply with the Debian policy I asked[33] about the pre-dependency on
debian-devel@l.d.o and Ian Jackson suggested[38] that this should be
fixed in dpkg instead. I
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 20:46:41 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> Control: block -1 by 683844
>
> Dear release team,
>
> Please
>
> unblock sgml-base/1.26+nmu4
>
> The version inten
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: block -1 by 683844
Dear release team,
Please
unblock sgml-base/1.26+nmu4
The version intends to fix all remaining RC bugs of sgml-base:
#678902: sgml-base needs to Pre-Depend o
21 matches
Mail list logo
