Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:11:28AM +1000, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> may I suggest a couple of copy-edits to your original:
Applied as-is.
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 02:36:20AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >
> > I propose this text instead:
>
> Thanks for your work on the rel
Vincent McIntyre dixit:
>- pdksh is no longer maintained (it has last seen active
>- development in 1999).
>+ pdksh is no longer maintained (it has not been
>+ actively developed since 1999).
sure
>- symlink. This compatibility binary behaves a bit more like the
>traditiona
may I suggest a couple of copy-edits to your original:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 02:36:20AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> I propose this text instead:
>
> ---
>
>
> Pdksh to mksh transition
>
> The Public Domain Korn Shell ( role="package">pdksh)
> package is being r
Hi Thorsten,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:48:49AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić dixit:
>
> >I propose this text instead:
> >
> >---
> >
> >
> > Pdksh to mksh transition
> ^
> I’d not capitalise here, as it’s a name/“trade”mark.
>
> If you really must, I gue
Joost van Baal-Ilić dixit:
>I propose this text instead:
>
>---
>
>
> Pdksh to mksh transition
^
I’d not capitalise here, as it’s a name/“trade”mark.
If you really must, I guess PDksh would make more sense.
>
>The Public Domain Korn Shell ( role="package">pdksh)
>pac
Hi,
Thanks a lot Baptiste and tg!
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:44:03PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I used your proposed text to write a patch. I hope I put it in the right
> section of
> the RN (issues).
>
> Baptiste
> --- svn.debian.org/manuals/release-notes/en
Julien Cristau dixit:
>If mksh is not a drop-in replacement then I'm not sure it's a good idea
>to have it provide a transitional package. Might as well leave the old
>pdksh alone so there's no functionality loss...
mksh contains an lksh binary which is a drop-in for scripts.
The only thing it’s
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 13:43:15 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Julien Cristau dixit:
>
> >That sounds appropriate for a pdksh NEWS.Debian file, not the release
> >notes?
>
> I don’t think so – the change should really be done before
> the new pdksh package is installed, since it’ll immediately
Julien Cristau dixit:
>That sounds appropriate for a pdksh NEWS.Debian file, not the release
>notes?
I don’t think so – the change should really be done before
the new pdksh package is installed, since it’ll immediately
begin affecting users.
>We can add pdksh to the list of packages that are go
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 17:43:47 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> Robert asked me to replace pdksh with its successor mksh
> in time for the wheezy release, and we’d like it to be
> gone in jessie. Right now, pdksh is a transitional package,
>
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
I used your proposed text to write a patch. I hope I put it in the right
section of
the RN (issues).
Baptiste
--- svn.debian.org/manuals/release-notes/en/issues.dbk 2013-04-01 18:45:14.0 +0200
+++ issues-mksh-bj.dbk 2013-04-01 19:12:05.0 +0200
@@ -186,
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Hi,
Robert asked me to replace pdksh with its successor mksh
in time for the wheezy release, and we’d like it to be
gone in jessie. Right now, pdksh is a transitional package,
and the upgrade might need some sysadmin and/or user effort:
① The sysadmin need
12 matches
Mail list logo
