Bug#680954: pynag - looking good, couple of questions

2012-07-23 Thread Páll Sigurðsson
Hey all, New upstream releases fixes issues mentioned by Jakub. I have built new packages and uploaded new packages to http://pall.sigurdsson.is/filez/pynag Clint, has the python modules team had any time to include the package yet ? Kind regards, Pall Sigurdsson On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:33 P

Bug#680954: pynag - looking good, couple of questions

2012-07-10 Thread Páll Sigurðsson
Hi Jakub, Thank you for the review! I built new packages according to your package suggestions and uploaded to http://pall.sigurdsson.is/filez/pynag/ as pynag-0.4.2-2. As for suggestions regarding software rather than just packaging, they are all valid. I will make sure this is fixed upstream.

Bug#680954: pynag - looking good, couple of questions

2012-07-10 Thread Páll Sigurðsson
Hi Clint, Naming it python-pynag sounds like a good, consistent idea as long as there is a pynag meta package (the package is called pynag in fedora and upstream cares about naming consistency). I would love to move maintenance to Debian Python Modules Team, especially if they are willing to do t

Bug#680954: pynag - looking good, couple of questions

2012-07-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Clint Byrum , 2012-07-10, 12:33: Since pynag is a public python module, the package should be called python-pynag. Right. Please see Python Policy §2.2 for details. I had only cursory look at the package and spotted a few more problems: Lintian reports: W: pynag source: syntax-error-in-dep

Bug#680954: pynag - looking good, couple of questions

2012-07-10 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi Pall. I just found pynag the other day and I am using it to do some automation of nagios deployment using juju. I have been using the package of the last couple hours, and it works great. Since pynag is a public python module, the package should be called python-pynag. If you want to have a me