On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 08:19:16AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >
> > Thanks - it would help to ping this bug when it uploaded too please.
>
> Hereby pinging the bug, package uploaded, debdiff attached to this mail.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> Thanks - it would help to ping this bug when it uploaded too please.
Hereby pinging the bug, package uploaded, debdiff attached to this mail.
> I'm sure you realised but s/uploads/updates/ in your quoted mail
> above (o
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:12:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> One remaining question: What about
>
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/scotch.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/format-security.patch
>
> Should I include this or not? Otherwise I can confirm that I sep
Hi
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >>No, we won't add hardening at this stage.
> >
> >OK, so if I do not hear anything from Christophe if he wants to
> >prepare
> >the tpu upload I will do so at latest next Monday (hopefully
> >earlier).
> >
> >Thanks for your
On 2013-04-04 20:40, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:43:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 08:33:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea how hard the handling of testing-proposed-uploads
might
> be for the release team. So I could imagine an
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:43:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 08:33:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I have no idea how hard the handling of testing-proposed-uploads might
> > be for the release team. So I could imagine an alternative plan to
> > unblock 5.1.1
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 08:33:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea how hard the handling of testing-proposed-uploads might
> be for the release team. So I could imagine an alternative plan to
> unblock 5.1.12b.dfsg-2 which has admittedly more changes than acceptable
> in freeze time (s
Hi Jonathan,
I do not claim responsibility for the very simple patch which was
actually done by Christophe Trophime but I could easily do the
following:
1. Branch scotch 5.1.12b.dfsg-1.1 and apply Christophe's changes
to fix the name clash issue
2. Upload 5.1.12b.dfsg-1.2 to testing-prop
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:21:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the gmap,scotch package:
>
> #680484: gmap and scotch: error when trying to install together
>
> It has been closed by A
9 matches
Mail list logo
