On 28/07/12 00:13, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> * Removed patch 013-workaround-681113-kfreebsd.diff (not longer needed
> since bug #681113 was fixed)
^^^
Seems that #681113 was fixed, but the build machines are running an
older version of eglibc, so the build broke on the kfreebs
On 27/07/12 17:17, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> So, I would like to upload this new version [2] to unstable, but I need
>> a sponsor since Paul is on holidays.
>>
>>
>> Will you be willing to sponsor it or should
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> So, I would like to upload this new version [2] to unstable, but I need
> a sponsor since Paul is on holidays.
>
>
> Will you be willing to sponsor it or should I fill a RFS on debian-mentors?
I am willing to
On 21/07/12 04:32, intrigeri wrote:
> hi,
>
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (21 Jul 2012 02:08:33 GMT) :
>> This patches were already reviewed by upstream [1] and will be
>> committed to the aircrack-ng repository ASAP.
>
> Looks good! :)
>
> There are minor differences (in changes to src/Mak
hi,
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (21 Jul 2012 02:08:33 GMT) :
> This patches were already reviewed by upstream [1] and will be
> committed to the aircrack-ng repository ASAP.
Looks good! :)
There are minor differences (in changes to src/Makefile) with the
patch submitted upstream, though. Wi
On 21/07/12 02:51, intrigeri wrote:
> I had a look at the debdiff. To be honest, I don't feel competent to
> evaluate the gnutls/gcrypt patches myself, so I'd rather not upload
> this into Debian unless I'm convinced upstream will integrate these
> patches, or they are reviewed by a knowledgeable t
Hi,
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (19 Jul 2012 16:56:03 GMT) :
> We won't have aircrack-ng on the next stable release :(
That's a bit sad, but this was huge work, no guarantee to succeed in
time, and we have backports for that kind of case, so the awesome work
you and others put into it is not
On 18/07/12 20:06, intrigeri wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (18 Jul 2012 17:45:08 GMT) :
>> I have the new version ready on mentors.
>
> Cool!
>
>> I will let you know when I get the OK from the release-team to the
>> unblock request.
>
> Sure.
>
Seems that the release-team is not w
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (18 Jul 2012 17:45:08 GMT) :
> I have the new version ready on mentors.
Cool!
> I will let you know when I get the OK from the release-team to the
> unblock request.
Sure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 18/07/12 19:37, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (05 Jul 2012 22:39:11 GMT) :
>> I don't think that the current version (1:1.1-3) should go into Wheezy
>> because of this issues. Perhaps (1:1.1-4) if the release team give an
>> exception could be the only chance of ha
Hi,
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (05 Jul 2012 22:39:11 GMT) :
> I don't think that the current version (1:1.1-3) should go into Wheezy
> because of this issues. Perhaps (1:1.1-4) if the release team give an
> exception could be the only chance of having aircrack-ng on Wheezy.
> Will be workin
On 05/07/12 20:00, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> Source: aircrack-ng
> Version: 1:1.1-3
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> aircrack-ng currently fails to build from source on most
> architectures:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aircrack-ng
>
> If nobody plans to fix the actual p
Source: aircrack-ng
Version: 1:1.1-3
Severity: important
Hi,
aircrack-ng currently fails to build from source on most
architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=aircrack-ng
If nobody plans to fix the actual problem soon,
I suggest building the package for i386 and amd64 only.
13 matches
Mail list logo
