Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2014-07-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 14:33 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 16:18 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Adam D. Barratt (2013-08-19): > > > > >> Any news there? (Yes, I realise there's a certain irony...) > > > > > > (Time for the irony to strike bac

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2014-02-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 16:18 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Adam D. Barratt (2013-08-19): > > >> Any news there? (Yes, I realise there's a certain irony...) > > > > (Time for the irony to strike back.) Ping? > > This got preempted by other things --- sorry about that.

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-10-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > Adam D. Barratt (2013-08-19): >> Any news there? (Yes, I realise there's a certain irony...) > > (Time for the irony to strike back.) Ping? This got preempted by other things --- sorry about that. I should be able to prepare and re-test the u

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-10-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Adam D. Barratt (2013-08-19): > Any news there? (Yes, I realise there's a certain irony...) (Time for the irony to strike back.) Ping? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 19:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 11:14 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Please go ahead with the upload. > > > > Now that I look back over it, I would like to drop some changes --- > > the upload was originally intended

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-07-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 11:14 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please go ahead with the upload. > > Now that I look back over it, I would like to drop some changes --- > the upload was originally intended for stable, and parts of the upload > are less important for oldstabl

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-07-07 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [it's generally considered polite to note when you're adding CCs...] Sorry about that. Will do so next time. [...] > Please go ahead with the upload. Now that I look back over it, I would like to drop some changes --- the upload was originally intended for stable, and

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-07-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[it's generally considered polite to note when you're adding CCs...] On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 19:07 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > In March, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 14:40 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> * "What this most needs is more testing. I know you have tested

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-07-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
In March, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 14:40 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> * "What this most needs is more testing. I know you have tested it, >>but I haven't had time to test it myself. I should have some in >>the next month and do not think this should roll out to

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-03-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 14:40 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> * "What this most needs is more testing. I know you have tested it, >>but I haven't had time to test it myself. I should have some in >>the next month and do not think this should roll out to s-p-u unt

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-03-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 14:40 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > * "What this most needs is more testing. I know you have tested it, >but I haven't had time to test it myself. I should have some in >the next month and do not think this should roll out to s-p-u until >then." I'm currently

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2013-03-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, In June, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > debian/changelog | 50 + > debian/rules | 4 +- > debian/source/include-binaries | 2 + > debian/symbols | 8 +-- > tests/files/bad-1-blo

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2012-10-05 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, In June, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > +xz-utils (5.0.0-3) stable; urgency=low > + > + * Fixes from upstream: Ping. A number of these are important to me: > +* liblzma: > + - lzma_easy_buffer_encode() and lzma_stream_buffer_encode() > +avoid writing Blocks with empty compresse

Bug#678624: pu: package xz-utils/5.0.0-3

2012-06-23 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: squeeze Hi, A few bugs have accumulated in xz-utils since squeeze was released. First, a packaging bug: - All compression functions are missing from the static library. (bug#673001) Upstream bugfixes