On 08/07/2012 17:12, shawn wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:40 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
>>> CXXFLAGS += -mno-thumb-interwork
>>>
>>> under the armel section
>>
>> If i remember well, I was using a similar 0001 patch for libv8 and
>> using that flag was a bette
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:40 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
> > CXXFLAGS += -mno-thumb-interwork
> >
> > under the armel section
>
> If i remember well, I was using a similar 0001 patch for libv8 and
> using that flag was a better solution. I think it poses problem
On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
> the skia patch here is tested and critical for armel.
>
> I am unable to test the rest cause I am having issues in the linking
> stage with chromium 20 with symbols that should be provided by the vpx
> library. I was using chromium-browser-20.0.1132.21~r139451-1
The arm.patch has my skia patch backwards
the opts_check_arm.cpp is the optimized, non-armv5 version.
the correct patch is:
Index: sid/src/skia/skia.gyp
===
--- sid.orig/src/skia/skia.gyp 2012-05-19 16:54:19.0 +0200
+++ sid/s
Hi,
about the "undefined reference to `vpx_codec_destroy'" and similar vpx*
linker errors on armel and armhf:
The builds have "use_system_vpx=1" defined for gyp. However, upstream
probably dropped support for that flag, or never supported it -- there's
no appearance of that "use_system_vpx" strin
oh, and BTW, nice job working on trying to use the system protobuf!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the skia patch here is tested and critical for armel.
I am unable to test the rest cause I am having issues in the linking
stage with chromium 20 with symbols that should be provided by the vpx
library. I was using chromium-browser-20.0.1132.21~r139451-1
Since these problems do not seem arm-speci
Hi,
shawn writes:
> Here is a working patch against current sid version. (for at least
> armel)
>
> It won't cleanly "git am" against git, but if you read it, it is trivial
> to resolve (but tedious)
> however, I do not know how to check against git anyways, as that debian
> directory doesn't see
Here is a working patch against current sid version. (for at least
armel)
It won't cleanly "git am" against git, but if you read it, it is trivial
to resolve (but tedious)
however, I do not know how to check against git anyways, as that debian
directory doesn't seem to be capable of building the s
Hi,
for me it still fails to build even with your patch:
http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/chromium/chromium-browser_18.0.1025.168~r134367-1lindi1_armel.build
http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/chromium/chromium-browser_18.0.1025.168~r134367-1lindi1.debian.tar.gz
...
if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.sub ; then
10 matches
Mail list logo
