On 30/06/2012 01:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:07:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Mourad Jaber wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-27
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
My system (debian/t
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:07:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Mourad Jaber wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.13-27
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> >* What led up to the situation?
> > My system (debian/testing) is usi
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Mourad Jaber wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.13-27
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> My system (debian/testing) is using 2.13-27 version of libc6 and I'm trying to
> upgrade to the current testing ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mourad,
Sorry it did not work out for you. This was what helped in my situation, but
perhaps there was something else I did
which might have fixed it beforehand.
It is bad when things break with libc as there is no option to remove it and
rei
Nothing better, all packages downgrade well except lib6 which fails always with the same
message !
Mourad
Le 08/05/2012 16:34, Nikolay Kichukov a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, try to downgrade using 'dpkg -i' the following:
libc6-dbg_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc6-d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, try to downgrade using 'dpkg -i' the following:
libc6-dbg_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc-bin_2.13-27_amd64.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.13-27_amd64.deb
HTH,
- -Nik
On 05/08/2012 11:51 AM, newbeewan wr
Hi,
I have tried that workaround but without any success :(
I get the same message :
# dpkg -i ./download/libc6_2.13-27_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 81988 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6:amd64 2.13-27 (using .../libc6_2.13-27_amd64.deb) ...
A copy of th
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-27
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
My system (debian/testing) is using 2.13-27 version of libc6 and I'm trying to
upgrade to the current testing version...
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
in
8 matches
Mail list logo