Bug#670687: maybe things should be different

2012-06-18 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:21 AM, LUK ShunTim wrote: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 02:39 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> I instead think that NEW behavior should match the proposed behavior >> of the other 2 (DESCRIBENEW and NEWDETAIL). >> >> On another level, I even think that those other 2 comma

Bug#670687: maybe things should be different

2012-06-18 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:21 AM, LUK ShunTim wrote: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 02:39 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> I instead think that NEW behavior should match the proposed behavior >> of the other 2 (DESCRIBENEW and NEWDETAIL). >> >> On another level, I even think that those other 2 comma

Bug#670687: maybe things should be different

2012-06-18 Thread LUK ShunTim
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 02:39 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > I instead think that NEW behavior should match the proposed behavior > of the other 2 (DESCRIBENEW and NEWDETAIL). > > On another level, I even think that those other 2 commands should go, > in favor of NEW -v1 and NEW -v2 respectiv

Bug#670687: maybe things should be different

2012-06-18 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
I instead think that NEW behavior should match the proposed behavior of the other 2 (DESCRIBENEW and NEWDETAIL). On another level, I even think that those other 2 commands should go, in favor of NEW -v1 and NEW -v2 respectively, since they are simply more verbose forms of the same. What you thiink