Hi Russ,
On 05.05.2012 22:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
> But in
> this case it sounds like it would help you be able to track where work is
> in progress and where people are having trouble, so yes, that makes sense.
> I don't expect the Debian packaging changes to be a huge challenge.
that's exactly
Arno Töll writes:
> On 05.05.2012 20:54, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Thanks for the follow-up on this.
> thanks for your follow-up, too. Would you mind if I tag your bug
> pending? According to your explanation your package is pretty much ready
> as it sounds.
Usually I hold off on tagging things pe
Hi Russ,
On 05.05.2012 20:54, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thanks for the follow-up on this.
thanks for your follow-up, too. Would you mind if I tag your bug
pending? According to your explanation your package is pretty much ready
as it sounds.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Fre
a...@debian.org writes:
> this is a follow-up message to your Apache 2.4 transition bug for
> package webauth. We are approaching an upload of the web server to
> Debian's Unstable repository as soon as the release team acknowledges
> the upload. Along that upload we are planning to raise the impo
tags 666861 '+upstream'
thanks
Dear maintainer,
this is a follow-up message to your Apache 2.4 transition bug for
package webauth. We are approaching an upload of the web server to
Debian's Unstable repository as soon as the release team acknowledges
the upload. Along that upload we are planning t
5 matches
Mail list logo
