Bug#666147: set UCF_FORCE_CONFFMISS when force-confmiss option is set

2012-03-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >What could be done is for dpkg to export its command line options > >in a new environment variable DPKG_CMDLINE_OPTS, and then ucf could > >inspect that new variable and verify if --force-confmiss is there. > > what if someone puts the option t

Bug#666147: set UCF_FORCE_CONFFMISS when force-confmiss option is set

2012-03-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: the dpkg's force-confmiss option, given as commandline parameter, or as an config option, has no effect when configuration file is maintained by ucf. that requires users to dig about the reason their config file is missing. The ucf supports UCF_

Bug#666147: set UCF_FORCE_CONFFMISS when force-confmiss option is set

2012-03-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > the dpkg's force-confmiss option, given as commandline parameter, or > as an config option, has no effect when configuration file is > maintained by ucf. that requires users to dig about the reason their > config file is missing. > > The uc

Bug#666147: set UCF_FORCE_CONFFMISS when force-confmiss option is set

2012-03-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Package: dpkg Version: 1.15.8.12 the dpkg's force-confmiss option, given as commandline parameter, or as an config option, has no effect when configuration file is maintained by ucf. that requires users to dig about the reason their config file is missing. The ucf supports UCF_FORCE_CONFFMIS