On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:59:09AM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > Problems reported so far include:
> > >
> > > E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
> > > E: Sub-process http received signal 10.
> >
> > This is #669061
>
> This appears to be Sparc only, right? We do had trouble with
> alignme
On 17.04.2012 08:59, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:47:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
> E: Sub-process http received signal 10.
This is #669061
This appears to be Sparc only,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:47:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:44 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > Ok, thanks! Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help
> > > at this point.
> >
> > It looks
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:44 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > Ok, thanks! Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help
> > at this point.
>
> It looks like the binNMUs aren't going quite as smoothly as hoped.
> Problems reported
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:44 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Ok, thanks! Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help
> at this point.
It looks like the binNMUs aren't going quite as smoothly as hoped.
Problems reported so far include:
E: Method http has died unexpectedly!
E: Sub-process
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:41:04PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:23 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:14:04PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > > We need to make sure that libept gets r
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:23 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:14:04PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > > We need to make sure that libept gets rebuild right after apt is ready
[...]
> > Well, libept got re-uploaded, b
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:14:04PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > We need to make sure that libept gets rebuild right after apt is ready
> > to ensure that its updated for the new apt. Ideally we take the
> > version in experimental that e
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> We need to make sure that libept gets rebuild right after apt is ready
> to ensure that its updated for the new apt. Ideally we take the
> version in experimental that encodes the apt ABI version in its soname
> to ensure that its clear that
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Please provide bin-NMUs for a coming apt ABI change (the apt version
in experimental will hit unstable as 0.9.0).
The version of apt in experimental includes multiarch support (among
other c
10 matches
Mail list logo
