On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 05.03.2012 15:37, schrieb Debian NonFree:
>
>> Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
>
>
> As if users being unable to upgrade their VLC package isn't enough.
>
> For a recent example see e.g. here:
> http://bugs.
Am 05.03.2012 15:37, schrieb Debian NonFree:
Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
As if users being unable to upgrade their VLC package isn't enough.
For a recent example see e.g. here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652250
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Please Fabian give us an example of what is broken with d-m.o
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Am 04.03.2012 22:08, schrieb Sergio Cipolla:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
I think I am contributing long enough to Debian to
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 18:08:04 -0300, Sergio Cipolla
wrote:
> Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
They _are_ crappy. They have kept on breaking VLC, both upstream and
Debian's in my annoying and weird ways throughout the years. Fabian is
right.
> d-m-o is a tradit
On 12-03-04 at 06:08pm, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
> Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
> d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
> Debian and has been for years.
> I can't tell the same of you.
You are correct, Sergio: Debian never was as
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:08:04PM -0300, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
> d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
> Debian and has been for years.
> I can't tell the same of you.
> I'm not sure if you're a Debian Maintainer or not (or worse, Debian
> Developer) but this kind of b
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:22:27PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
>
> I'm not sure what you're referring to exactly.
Oh, you were referring to a comment in bug #660814 - sorry, I didn't notice
that.
Arnout
--
To UNSU
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
You know very well why it uses an epoch in their versioning: exactly
so as people that want/need to
9 matches
Mail list logo
