Bug#660813: ld.gold doesn't take LD_RUN_PATH into account

2013-07-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: reassign -1 binutils Control: found -1 2.22-5 Control: found -1 2.23.52.20130722-1 Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 patch The bug has always been present in binutils (the binary package), but its effect was visible particularly when binutils-gold was installed. Now binutils-go

Bug#660813: ld.gold doesn't take LD_RUN_PATH into account

2012-02-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre
tags 660813 upstream forwarded 660813 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13764 thanks Hi Jonathan, On 2012-02-22 04:29:53 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > How about this patch (untested)? Thanks, this solves the problem. > If it looks reasonable and works ok, please feel free to file

Bug#660813: ld.gold doesn't take LD_RUN_PATH into account

2012-02-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Vincent, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Unlike the standard ld, ld.gold doesn't take LD_RUN_PATH into account. > In particular, this breaks the build of some programs (like GNU MPFR) > when LD_RUN_PATH is used together with autoconf's AC_RUN_IFELSE. How about this patch (untested)? If it looks rea