Bug#657828: Re: [ibus-devel] Prepare ibus 1.4.1

2012-02-11 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 12:01:53PM +0900, Takao Fujiwara wrote: > I think It is no problem to add the subdir of the package name in > libexec file paths. However probably I don't think to add the subdir > of arch names for ibus-ui-gtk* at present. For FEDORA, sure yes. But this is how Debia

Bug#657828: Re: [ibus-devel] Prepare ibus 1.4.1

2012-02-06 Thread Takao Fujiwara
I think It is no problem to add the subdir of the package name in libexec file paths. However probably I don't think to add the subdir of arch names for ibus-ui-gtk* at present. I might think @PACKAGE@-@MAJOR_VERSION@ instead of pkglibexecdir if we would add the subdir. It might be an idea to move

Bug#657828: Re: [ibus-devel] Prepare ibus 1.4.1

2012-02-06 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi thanks for your insights, > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Peng Huang wrote: > > I guess fedora does not have hard rule for internal exe files. The > > application can install them in libexec or pkglibexec. But seems most apps > > will install them in libexec. So I am think debian have to pa