Hi all,
Matteo F. Vescovi (13/02/2012):
> An usually super-active Alessio already fixed it.
> I added the Provides field also for libglewmx1.5-dev, in case.
catching up with this transition, it seems the level 1 is in good shape.
I've just scheduled binNMUs for level 2. Progress can be seen on t
Hi!
On 13/02/2012 11:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
So it seems our binNMU did not help. Turns out at least pymol,
avogadro, hugin and libsfml use "libglew1.5-dev", which libglew-dev does
not provide.
Could you add a provides for libglew1.5-dev?
~Niels
An usually super-active Alessio already
On 2012-02-10 10:04, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Sounds good so far - do you know if there has been any API changes?
>
> It's API compatible.
>
>> However, just to be clear - if there are any FTBFS issues due to the
>> -dev renaming, I am exp
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Sounds good so far - do you know if there has been any API changes?
It's API compatible.
> However, just to be clear - if there are any FTBFS issues due to the
> -dev renaming, I am expecting that the two of you will be NMU'ing
> affected p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I'm filing this bug for the transition of glew package.
On August 2011 the new 1.7.0 stable version has been released by
upstream.
On December 27, 2011 a testing-pur
5 matches
Mail list logo
