On 09/01/2012 08:51, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oh it's not a bug you filed. File a new one, that'll be better. Please
mention as much information as you can. Kernel version, X.org driver
version, Mesa version, crash backtrace, or even better crash id from the
upstream crash reporter (try reproducing the
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:03:52PM +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 08:01, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >Reopen. That list is for QA testing, not for supported stuff. Note that
> >most crashes now are usually mesa bugs, X.org driver bugs or kernel bugs.
>
> Thanks Mike.
> Looks like i've very
On 08/01/2012 08:01, Mike Hommey wrote:
Reopen. That list is for QA testing, not for supported stuff. Note that
most crashes now are usually mesa bugs, X.org driver bugs or kernel bugs.
Thanks Mike.
Looks like i've very few rights in that bug and the status is not
editable by me: so i cannot r
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 02:41:35PM +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> Hi Mike.
>
> I'm quite amazed of the motivation that has took to closing this
> upstream bug (that i cited in msg #15):
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699181
>
> What do you think?
>
> The following bug was cited
Hi Mike.
I'm quite amazed of the motivation that has took to closing this
upstream bug (that i cited in msg #15):
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699181
What do you think?
The following bug was cited as what Mozilla consider to be supported
platform:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.or
5 matches
Mail list logo
