Hi.
I just uploaded a package to (hopefully) fix this bug. Thanks for
pointing it out.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:15:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:12:45 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:08:13AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > > > So I haven't actually *checked*, but from what I understood of this
> > > > thread the ABI cha
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:12:45 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:08:13AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > > So I haven't actually *checked*, but from what I understood of this
> > > thread the ABI changes were compatible, which means there is and was no
> > > reason to bump
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:08:13AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > So I haven't actually *checked*, but from what I understood of this
> > thread the ABI changes were compatible, which means there is and was no
> > reason to bump the SONAME, only the version in the shlibs packaging
> > metadata, fo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 06:04:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Now, this breaks existing installs of dolfin, so this is not an
> > option. I am now wondering what the best course of action is. Do I
> > create a new named package, or manually update the soname locally to
> > Debian? Or, do I re
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:19:46 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Julien,
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:29:55PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > To fix this issue, just make sure that the system uses the same
> > > > version of the header files as the version of the run-time library.
> > >
On 23 December 2011 02:19, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> After some discussion with upstream here is the summary:
>
> - Upstream will not raise the soname, since this, in their view, is
> does not warrant one. Their opinion is that armadillo's ABI isn't
> really for direct use by the end user, so a rec
Dear Julien,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:29:55PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > To fix this issue, just make sure that the system uses the same
> > > version of the header files as the version of the run-time library.
> > > Specifically, this means if Armadillo 2.4.2 is used, both the headers
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:32:05 -0500, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:46:51 +1000, Conrad Sand
> wrote:
> > In bug 651997
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651997
> > libarmadillo2 is listed as version "2.2.5+dfsg-1", which implies that
> > the header files
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:46:51 +1000, Conrad Sand wrote:
> In bug 651997
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651997
> libarmadillo2 is listed as version "2.2.5+dfsg-1", which implies that
> the header files for armadillo have been updated to a later version,
> but not the run-time lib
In bug 651997
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651997
libarmadillo2 is listed as version "2.2.5+dfsg-1", which implies that
the header files for armadillo have been updated to a later version,
but not the run-time library. Otherwise it's impossible to obtain the
"undefined symbol:
I am CCing upstream here.
Dear Conrad,
Was an shlib bump warranted, based on your view of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651997 ?
Thanks.
Kumar
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:35:53AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> [Adding Kumar (maintainer of Armadillo) in Cc]
>
> On Tue, Dec 20,
[Adding Kumar (maintainer of Armadillo) in Cc]
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Julien Cristau
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
>> > This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tighte
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> > Did, and it helped. Thanks very much!
>
> Good!
>
> > This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened
> > dependencies?
>
> The dependency on libarma
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:13:00 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> > Hmm, I feel like automatic shared library dependencies should have been
> > able to catch this, i.e. someone is supposed to have done something with
> > the soname at some poin
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> Hmm, I feel like automatic shared library dependencies should have been
> able to catch this, i.e. someone is supposed to have done something with
> the soname at some point--I'm just not sure what... :)
Yes, I agree. It is most likely a
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> > Did, and it helped. Thanks very much!
>
> Good!
>
> > This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened
> > dependencies?
>
> The dependency on libarmadill
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> Did, and it helped. Thanks very much!
Good!
> This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened
> dependencies?
The dependency on libarmadillo2 is added automatically by
${shlibs:Depends}. I guess I could add a versio
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:54:09 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thank you for your report, but I couldn't reproduce your bug.
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> > When I run any one of the simple fenics demos, I get this error message:
> >
> > ImportErro
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for your report, but I couldn't reproduce your bug.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> When I run any one of the simple fenics demos, I get this error message:
>
> ImportError: /usr/lib/libdolfin.so.1.0: undefined symbol: wrapper_dgesv_
This symbo
Package: python-dolfin
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
When I run any one of the simple fenics demos, I get this error message:
ImportError: /usr/lib/libdolfin.so.1.0: undefined symbol: wrapper_dgesv_
For definiteness, I used this progra
21 matches
Mail list logo
