Bug#651004: metainit

2014-02-07 Thread Joachim Breitner
Dear Petter, Am Freitag, den 07.02.2014, 21:46 +0100 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: > [Joachim Breitner] > > sounds great. I’ll leave it to you from here on. If you have a new > > metainit package that I should sponsor, you are welcome to put > > yourself in the Maintainer field. > > Hi. Did anyt

Bug#651004: metainit

2014-02-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Joachim Breitner] > sounds great. I’ll leave it to you from here on. If you have a new > metainit package that I should sponsor, you are welcome to put > yourself in the Maintainer field. Hi. Did anything happen with metainit since this post? Since then, I went ahead and implemented a library

Bug#651004: metainit

2011-12-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2011, 10:45 + schrieb Bryan Hunt: > > If all you care about for now is metainit, you do not even have to > > become a Debian Maintainer; you can hack on metainit and prepare the > > packages, and then have a sponsor (e.g. me) upload the package. Only > > when you get

Bug#651004: metainit

2011-12-06 Thread Bryan Hunt
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:35:24 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > if you feel more comfortable with git, I would not mind converting the > repo to git first; I’m not attached to the choice of Darcs. It might > also make contributions by other more likely. I don't mind.

Bug#651004: metainit

2011-12-05 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 05.12.2011, 19:40 + schrieb Bryan Hunt: > On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:00:36 +0100, Joachim Breitner > wrote: > > it seems that the blog advertising, as Bryan prognosed, helped to raise > > some interest. Of course I can apply Bryan’s patch if it helps him. > > Otherwise, I’m a

Bug#651004: metainit

2011-12-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Bryan Hunt] > I would be happy to do so, and integrate Petter's patch. I'm > familiar with Git/Mercurial/SVN so I can figure out how to use > Darc's. Great. :) > However, I am not hugely familiar with the Debian ecosystem, and > will possibly be away for quite a lot of December. Would you be abl

Bug#651004: metainit

2011-12-05 Thread Bryan Hunt
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:00:36 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > it seems that the blog advertising, as Bryan prognosed, helped to raise > some interest. Of course I can apply Bryan’s patch if it helps him. > Otherwise, I’m a bit reluctant to re-start development and, e.g., review > and apply Petter’

Bug#651004: metainit

2011-12-05 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Petter, Hi Bryan, I’m joining the conversation here, hence the full-quotes: Am Montag, den 05.12.2011, 11:52 + schrieb Bryan Hunt: On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:14:09 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Non-text part: multipart/signed > > The usual way to submit patches, as well as bug reports and

Bug#651004: metainit: Move common shell script code to /lib/init/std-sysvinitscript?

2011-12-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: metainit Version: 0.0.5 Severity: wishlist Hi. Thanks to your blog post, I just had a closer look at metainit, and it occured to me that it would be cleaner if the generated init.d scripts sourced a common file for the common code. Here is a draft patch implementing this, while also fi