On 26/01/16 19:26, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Emilio and Cyril,
>
> thanks to you both for the help!
>
>> No, that doesn't solve the problem. Rebuilding everything takes time,
>> packages
>
>> will fail to build, and we will have processes that load both shared
>> libraries.
>> That nee
Hi Emilio and Cyril,
thanks to you both for the help!
>No, that doesn't solve the problem. Rebuilding everything takes time, packages
>will fail to build, and we will have processes that load both shared libraries.
>That needs to work. And it needs to be tested and verified.
>
>If that didn't wo
On 26/01/16 17:54, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Emilio!
>
>
>> Can send another summary with your proposed plan here? Currently libpng12-dev
>> provides libpng-dev but libpng16-dev doesn't. Are you going to switch that?
>> Or
>> do you plan to build a libpng-dev package from src:libpng1.6?
Gianfranco Costamagna (2016-01-26):
> >Another thing I want to confirm before starting this transition is what Cyril
> >asked earlier today in another mail. What happens if libpng12.so and
> >libpng16.so
> >are both loaded into a process? Does that work properly, because of versioned
> >symbols e
Hi Emilio!
>Can send another summary with your proposed plan here? Currently libpng12-dev
>provides libpng-dev but libpng16-dev doesn't. Are you going to switch that? Or
>do you plan to build a libpng-dev package from src:libpng1.6?
sure, the only reason that libpng-dev wasn't provided has been
Hi,
On 22/01/16 14:59, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Emilio and release team
> (sorry for the previous mail and thanks for the untag, I fixed the uploa
> d)
>
> as you have noticed yesterday and today I NMUed the remaining "please
> switch from libpng-{3,12,12-0}-dev to libpng-dev" bugs.
> (around ~30
Hi,
>Many thanks Gianfranco for the summary!
thanks to you for all the work, I just did a very little part!
>Regarding the packages requiring libpng-config, I proposed to the maintainers
>do another libng16 upload, so that that tool will be pulled in as depdenceny
>(Otherwise we'll have the so
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Emilio and release team
> (sorry for the previous mail and thanks for the untag, I fixed the uploa
> d)
>
> as you have noticed yesterday and today I NMUed the remaining "please
> switch from libpng-{3,12,12-0}-dev to libpng-dev" bugs.
> (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Emilio and release team
(sorry for the previous mail and thanks for the untag, I fixed the uploa
d)
as you have noticed yesterday and today I NMUed the remaining "please
switch from libpng-{3,12,12-0}-dev to libpng-dev" bugs.
(around ~30 NMUs tha
Control: tags -1 - patch pending
On 21/01/16 15:48, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing control commands:
>
>> tags 650601 + patch
> Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
> Added tag(s) patch.
>> tags 650601 + pending
> Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: lib
10 matches
Mail list logo
