On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> Having read im-config's README.Debian and having checked file
> provisions of packages, it looks like all the control is centralized in
> im-config package, rather than distributed as in im-switch.
> Does this mean im-config sho
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:16:50PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * fcitx, libuim-data, scim, scim-pinyin
>Packages with Recommends: im-config | im-switch
>Safe for im-switch removal and no impact with default installation
>(scim-pinyin does not need to do this since scim pulls this i
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
>> * gtk-im-libthai, gtk3-im-libthai
>> Packages with Recommends: im-switch
>> Possible to do im-switch removal
>> No support by im-config at this moment (Need to disc
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> * gtk-im-libthai, gtk3-im-libthai
> Packages with Recommends: im-switch
> Possible to do im-switch removal
> No support by im-config at this moment (Need to discuss)
I'm about to try to switch to im-config, too. But it seems more compl
Package: im-switch
Version: 1.20
Severity: normal
(I am CCing all maintainers which make some dependency to the im-switch
packages.)
TODO:
Agree and document post wheezy situation for im-switch, so people on
wheezy will not be surprised when upgrading to wheezy+1.
PROPOSAL: In README.Debian, sta
5 matches
Mail list logo
