Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +wontfix
Le mardi, 22 mai 2012 20.39:56, Mats Erik Andersson a écrit :
> > Do you intend to provide more info to this bug ? Without input, it will
> > certainly not get fixed, either way.
>
> I am alive, but without access to my Debian developping machines.
> Twice I ha
Hi,
Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> On the other hand the non-portability of
> built-in "echo" must be taken care of with "/bin/echo".
"printf" (in POSIX) accepts a %b specifier to emulate old-fashioned
echo. So all the behaviors are available:
bashPOSIX sh
> Do you intend to provide more info to this bug ? Without input, it will
> certainly not get fixed, either way.
I am alive, but without access to my Debian developping machines.
Twice I have written a response, but discarded the text. The problem
here is that on one hand the dependency boot migra
Hi Mats,
Le 07.03.2012 14:25, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Le 04.10.2011 21:36, Mats Erik Andersson a écrit :
>> At a previous time the functions in 'init-functions'
>> were allowed to use
>>
>>/bin/echo -e
>>
>> whereas presently they are all forced into using
>>
>> /bin/echo -n
>>
>> I
tags 644285 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Mats, and thanks for your bugreport,
Le 04.10.2011 21:36, Mats Erik Andersson a écrit :
> At a previous time the functions in 'init-functions'
> were allowed to use
>
>/bin/echo -e
>
> whereas presently they are all forced into using
>
> /bin/echo -n
>
>
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.2-28
Severity: normal
At a previous time the functions in 'init-functions'
were allowed to use
/bin/echo -e
whereas presently they are all forced into using
/bin/echo -n
It would be far superior to use
/bin/echo -ne
as this restores to any script author th
6 matches
Mail list logo