Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

2011-08-29 Thread Jon Bernard
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > Am 29.08.2011 14:57, schrieb Jon Bernard: > > >>> e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. > >> Shouldn't they then be removed from the archive? > > I considered that, but I found e16 is still available in sid, so > > I wasn't sure. If e

Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

2011-08-29 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 29.08.2011 14:57, schrieb Jon Bernard: >>> e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. >> Shouldn't they then be removed from the archive? > I considered that, but I found e16 is still available in sid, so > I wasn't sure. If e16 is no longer installable, then yes, I will file >

Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

2011-08-29 Thread Jon Bernard
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > Am 29.08.2011 14:07, schrieb Jon Bernard: > > e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. > > Shouldn't they then be removed from the archive? I considered that, but I found e16 is still available in sid, so I wasn't sure. If e16 is no lon

Bug#639686: Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

2011-08-29 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 29.08.2011 14:07, schrieb Jon Bernard: > e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. Shouldn't they then be removed from the archive? Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#639685: O: e16keyedit

2011-08-29 Thread Jon Bernard
Package: wnpp Severity: normal e16 was replaced by e17, making this package obsolete. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org