On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:30:42PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> OCAML might be in a similar situation, but it seems that they donât use
> libffi. Their packages do, however, all seem to have a dependency on
> libc6 which corresponds to our situation. Only that a so-name bump of
> libc is prob
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2011, 11:39 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow:
> > I’m not sure if I got your conclusion: Do you expect problems if the RTS
> > and libraries were built against different versions of libffi, or not?
> To answer your question: yes I would expect problems.
Thanks for your as
2 matches
Mail list logo
