Bug#638853: fail2ban: use iptables-new by default for ssh jail

2011-08-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Leo, sorry, my brain must be resting at the moment, but I would need more detailed description of what/how you are trying to achieve, to give any promise ;-) On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438901#15 > > in particular? > Th

Bug#638853: fail2ban: use iptables-new by default for ssh jail

2011-08-22 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 22/08/11 15:43, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > have you seen > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438901 > and > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438901#15 > in particular? That's a very good point. I'm gonna try cooking up a version of iptables-multiport which wraps

Bug#638853: fail2ban: use iptables-new by default for ssh jail

2011-08-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
have you seen http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438901 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438901#15 in particular? On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > Package: fail2ban > Version: 0.8.5-1 > Severity: wishlist > Hi, > After reading through #3507

Bug#638853: fail2ban: use iptables-new by default for ssh jail

2011-08-22 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Package: fail2ban Version: 0.8.5-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, After reading through #350746, I wonder why iptables-new isn't used by default for the ssh jail. I understand and agree with the arguments about possible interactions with other protocols and thus the reason for not using it per default fo