Hello,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Thu 21 Jul 2011 00:33:27 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 21.07.2011 00:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes it. Shall I commit it to upstream grub2?
> >
> Go ahead
The patch has been commited upstream, as attached, months ago, could it
be
On 21.07.2011 00:54, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Thu 21 Jul 2011 00:31:51 +0200, a
> écrit :
>> On 21.07.2011 00:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> tags 634799 + upstream patch
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>> I've looked into it and arrived to the similar conclu
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, le Thu 21 Jul 2011 00:31:51 +0200, a
écrit :
> On 21.07.2011 00:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > tags 634799 + upstream patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> I've looked into it and arrived to the similar conclusion that the
> grub.cfg.new with inode = 0 is the
On 21.07.2011 00:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> The attached patch fixes it. Shall I commit it to upstream grub2?
>
Go ahead
> Samuel
> patch
>
>
> === modified file 'grub-core/fs/ext2.c'
> --- grub-core/fs/ext2.c 2011-04-11 21:01:51 +
> +++ grub-core/fs/ext2.c 2011-07-20 22:20:43 +00
On 21.07.2011 00:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> tags 634799 + upstream patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
I've looked into it and arrived to the similar conclusion that the
grub.cfg.new with inode = 0 is the problem. However I think no such
entries should be there in the first place. In any case GRUB must b
tags 634799 + upstream patch
thanks
Hello,
Digging a bit with the issue, it seems grub2 does not ignore entries
with inode == 0 while it should. See linux' ext2_readdir() in
fs/ext2/dir.c doing it:
for ( ;(char*)de <= limit; de = ext2_next_entry(de)) {
if
6 matches
Mail list logo
