Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL

2011-06-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:26 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:00 +, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > >

Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL

2011-06-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:00 +, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 > > Severity: normal > > > > SUBLEVEL is reserved for -stable in kernel 3.0 and > > newer. As Debian ker

Bug#630474: linux 3.0 package names should probably not include SUBLEVEL

2011-06-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal SUBLEVEL is reserved for -stable in kernel 3.0 and newer. As Debian kernels did not include the part of the version number used for stable updates in the past, I expect that you are not planning to include them now. Thus, the