Bug#630334: libnatpmp-dev: shouldn't recommend minissdpd

2011-06-14 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 14/06/11 09:40, Thomas Goirand wrote: > FYI, the package currently doesn't build in SID, due to the > --no-undefined option in GCC. I'm discussing with upstream prior to > another upload (of maybe, an up-to-date version). Great! Thanks a lot for the heads-up! Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes

Bug#630334: libnatpmp-dev: shouldn't recommend minissdpd

2011-06-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
FYI, the package currently doesn't build in SID, due to the --no-undefined option in GCC. I'm discussing with upstream prior to another upload (of maybe, an up-to-date version). Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#630334: libnatpmp-dev: shouldn't recommend minissdpd

2011-06-12 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Package: libnatpmp-dev Version: 20101211-1 Severity: minor Tags: experimental Hi, A -dev package recommending a daemon seems a bit too much. Maybe downgrading to suggests? (IMHO lib packages in general should do neither, except for some very particular corner-cases, but this doesn't seem to be on