Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Well, the above guess was close. At last I reproduced it again (and
> was able to capture the output this time); fix follows. Will attach
> the output in a separate message for the curious.
Attached for reference.
VERSION 2
acquire::file::timeout=20
acquire::ftp::timeou
On Mon, 23 May 2011 23:18:10 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 21:25:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I would like to push the changes to the public git repository, but
> > alioth is currently down for maintenance
[...]
> There's some additional news [4], but it seems
On Mon, 23 May 2011 21:25:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I would like to push the changes to the public git repository, but
> alioth is currently down for maintenance [1][2][3]... :-(
> By the way, have you got any more recent news about the status of
> alioth? It should have been back u
On Wed, 18 May 2011 20:03:09 -0500 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > I hope I manage to find the time to test your patch soon...
> >
> > Do you think your patch is copyrighted by you, or is it trivial enough
> > that it is not covered by copyright?
>
> It's trivial imho.
OK,
Francesco Poli wrote:
> I hope I manage to find the time to test your patch soon...
>
> Do you think your patch is copyrighted by you, or is it trivial enough
> that it is not covered by copyright?
It's trivial imho. I just looked at the code and this seemed to be
the most obvious missing piece
On Wed, 18 May 2011 11:53:48 -0500 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[...]
> How about this? It would probably be nicer to print the full $pkg
> line on error, but I'm lazy.
I hope I manage to find the time to test your patch soon...
Do you think your patch is copyrighted by you, or is it trivial enough
t
unblock 626937 by 627188
tags 626937 + patch
quit
Hi again,
Francesco Poli wrote:
> It seems that, at /usr/share/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs/logic.rb:770 ,
> the `chomp!' method is called for a nil object.
> Hence, it seems that pkgnames[index] is nil, for some reason.
>
> I must investigate furth
On Mon, 16 May 2011 17:18:20 -0500 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 626937 + unreproducible
> quit
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
You're welcome!
>
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Please note that Cupt is not really fully tested with apt-listbugs (at
> > least as far as I know)
>
>
tags 626937 + unreproducible
quit
Hi Francesco,
Thanks for your reply.
Francesco Poli wrote:
> Please note that Cupt is not really fully tested with apt-listbugs (at
> least as far as I know)
I've been using apt-listbugs with cupt on amd64 for a while, for what
it's worth.
> Please try to rep
On Mon, 16 May 2011 08:51:00 -0500 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.1.4
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for your bug report!
>
> New armel squeeze system, running through qemu.
Taking into account your self-reply, I take notice that what you are
ta
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> New armel squeeze system
Erm, new armel _wheezy_ system. Installed using yesterday's d-i
daily build. Sorry for the nonsense.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.4
Severity: important
Hi,
New armel squeeze system, running through qemu. After installing
apt-listbugs from unstable, I decided it's time to upgrade everything
to experimental. So I told cupt to do so ("cupt full-upgrade").
6 new packages were to be installe
12 matches
Mail list logo
