Bug#626091: slapos.tool.format: slapformat/bridge_note is Debconf abuse

2011-06-09 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. > Well, that could be said for many packages where some action is > often required before it can work. That doesn't really push for > having something interrupting the installationto basically say > "there's work left to make package wor

Bug#626091: slapos.tool.format: slapformat/bridge_note is Debconf abuse

2011-05-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Arnaud Fontaine (ar...@debian.org): > Hi, > > > This debconf note is isplayed at high priority without any attempt > > to determine whether it is useful or not. This perfectly fits the > > definition of debconf abuse, I'm afraid. > > > This information should go in README

Bug#626091: slapos.tool.format: slapformat/bridge_note is Debconf abuse

2011-05-08 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hi, > This debconf note is isplayed at high priority without any attempt > to determine whether it is useful or not. This perfectly fits the > definition of debconf abuse, I'm afraid. > This information should go in README.Debian. There is no reason to > interrupt the package

Bug#626091: slapos.tool.format: slapformat/bridge_note is Debconf abuse

2011-05-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: slapos.tool.format Severity: normal This debconf note is isplayed at high priority without any attempt to determine whether it is useful or not. This perfectly fits the definition of debconf abuse, I'm afraid. This information should go in README.Debian. There is no reason to interrupt t