On 05/04/2012 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-04-03 at 11:57pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> it would be very nice to review npm package sitting at :
>> git://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/npm.git
>
>
> Patch 2001 refer to debian/copyright. I recommend to document
> explicitly, as the pat
On 12-04-03 at 11:57pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> it would be very nice to review npm package sitting at :
> git://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/npm.git
Patch 2001 refer to debian/copyright. I recommend to document
explicitly, as the patch file will appear outside of the context of the
full p
Hi all,
and Jonas in particular :)
it would be very nice to review npm package sitting at :
git://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/npm.git
and eventually upload it.
Best regards,
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
2012/3/28 Jérémy Lal :
> For npm-1.1.4, the last one is :
> git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-which.git
> (i asked David Paleino to take care of that one).
Will do it ASAP, probably tonight (UTC+1+DST) :)
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
For npm-1.1.4, the last one is :
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-which.git
(i asked David Paleino to take care of that one).
IMO the three other modules that are left are too bound to npm to be
packaged separatedly.
It would also be a good idea to upload npm 1.1.4 soon, as more recent
vers
> To sum up, those are waiting to be review/uploaded :
> git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-inherits.git (debian native)
> git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-block-stream.git
> git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-rimraf.git
> git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-fstream.git
> git://git
To sum up, those are waiting to be review/uploaded :
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-inherits.git (debian native)
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-block-stream.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-rimraf.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-fstream.git
git://git.debian.org/
Added fstream and tar.
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-inherits.git (debian native)
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-block-stream.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-rimraf.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-fstream.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-tar.git
Jé
Hi,
a small update today :
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-inherits.git
source 3.0(native) had to be rewritten from scratch because of
non DFSG license.
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-block-stream.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-rimraf.git
Many thanks to David Pale
Current batch of packages waiting for review/upload :
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-lru-cache.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-minimatch.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-semver.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-ini.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-gr
I'll maintain the list of packages to review/upload here :
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-lru-cache.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-minimatch.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-semver.git
git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-ini.git
Cheers,
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On 13/03/2012 23:37, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> I tried to address the most important issues, so as to have an
> acceptable npm package.
> Please see :
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/npm.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog
>
> Note that debian/copyright and debian/copyright_hints are now sy
I tried to address the most important issues, so as to have an
acceptable npm package.
Please see :
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/npm.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog
Note that debian/copyright and debian/copyright_hints are now synched.
i put debian/TODO here :
* Package ./node
On 08/03/2012 15:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-08 at 10:34am, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 13:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On 12-03-06 at 01:14pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
npm is too old to function with current nodejs in debian. Please
update the package!
>>
On 12-03-08 at 10:34am, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 13:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-03-06 at 01:14pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> npm is too old to function with current nodejs in debian. Please
> >> update the package!
> >>
> >> I might (hopefully...) have time to help
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 13:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-06 at 01:14pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> npm is too old to function with current nodejs in debian. Please
>> update the package!
>>
>> I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
>> there any roadmap on what is
On 12-03-06 at 11:03pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 18:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-03-06 at 06:32pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> On 06/03/2012 18:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>> Oh, and that fork or Expat license seems to have a flaw: It is not
> >>> clear whether it talks only about
On 06/03/2012 18:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-06 at 06:32pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 18:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On 12-03-06 at 05:40pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 06/03/2012 17:14, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this
On 12-03-06 at 06:32pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 18:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-03-06 at 05:40pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> On 06/03/2012 17:14, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >>> I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
> >>> there any roadmap on what is missing
On 06/03/2012 18:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-06 at 05:40pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 17:14, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
>>> there any roadmap on what is missing to get an updated npm package?
>>
>> There is :
>>
>
On 12-03-06 at 05:40pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 17:14, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
> > there any roadmap on what is missing to get an updated npm package?
>
> There is :
>
> * package dependencies that are in node_modules
On 12-03-06 at 01:14pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> npm is too old to function with current nodejs in debian. Please
> update the package!
>
> I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
> there any roadmap on what is missing to get an updated npm package?
Great!
Pull the gi
On 06/03/2012 17:14, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
> there any roadmap on what is missing to get an updated npm package?
There is :
* package dependencies that are in node_modules
* make sure the license is free (MIT +no-false-attribs)
severity 622628 serious
thanks
npm is too old to function with current nodejs in debian. Please
update the package!
I might (hopefully...) have time to help, and I will need this. Is
there any roadmap on what is missing to get an updated npm package?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBS
Package: npm
Version: 0.2.19-1
Followup-For: Bug #622628
Unstable just got nodejs 0.6.2. Unfortunately, this breaks npm 0.2.19.
Hopefully we can bump up the priority of packaging the newer npm now?
cananian@skiffserv:~$ npm
node.js:201
throw e; // process.nextTick error, or '
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:55:23 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:54:00 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:41:48 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:34:46 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems we are all too busy! I reall
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:54:00 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:41:48 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:34:46 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >
> > > It seems we are all too busy! I really could use a newer npm, but I see
> > > that it is held up because of
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:41:48 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:34:46 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
>
> > It seems we are all too busy! I really could use a newer npm, but I see
> > that it is held up because of the "11 small modules that npm depends
> > on", that it was discusse
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:34:46 -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> It seems we are all too busy! I really could use a newer npm, but I see
> that it is held up because of the "11 small modules that npm depends
> on", that it was discussed should be packaged separately.
One of these is "request", which I
It seems we are all too busy! I really could use a newer npm, but I see
that it is held up because of the "11 small modules that npm depends
on", that it was discussed should be packaged separately.
Unfortunately, no progress has happened there. I wonder if it might be
worthwhile to take a small
Hi Martin,
On 11-09-20 at 11:01pm, Martin Skøtt wrote:
> I can see that many upstream versions have been imported into Git
> without new packages being released. Let me know if you need any help
> testing or if there is something else we can do to help a new release
> along :)
Thanks for the o
I can see that many upstream versions have been imported into Git without
new packages being released. Let me know if you need any help testing or if
there is something else we can do to help a new release along :)
Regards,
Martin Skøtt
Hi
A lot of node projects and their dependencies have switched to >=1.0. Is
there anything we can help you with?
Stephan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Npm is In version 1.0.23.
It would be great to have a debian package for this.
Npm is quite stable right now.
Best regards
Sławek
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:28:48PM +0200, Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
> Looks like npm is stable enough. They have moved to 1.x . Currently
> the latest tag is v1.0.17
>
> Would be great to update the Debian npm package. The npm 0.2.19 is a
> bit old :p
I tried to install etherpad-lite [1] and realized
Looks like npm is stable enough. They have moved to 1.x . Currently the
latest tag is v1.0.17
Would be great to update the Debian npm package. The npm 0.2.19 is a bit
old :p
https://github.com/isaacs/npm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
let's fix the nodejs updates, then npm 1.0 can go to experimental.
BTW we might wait for a release version (not rc) of npm.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: npm
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid
Hi!
It seems npm is close to a new release (v1.0.1rc7). Would be good to update
when it's available.
Cheers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental'
38 matches
Mail list logo
