tags 621479 pending
quit
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:49:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Justin B Rye writes:
>
> > I was just looking at the incoming version of policy, and it occurred to
> > me: is there any particular reason why there still needs to be a section
> > in policy for "The OSF/Mot
Le Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:49:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> Yeah, this whole section looks completely obsolete. I think we should
> just remove it entirely. Objections or seconds?
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 91173a5..9b4a93e 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/pol
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:49:29AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I was just looking at the incoming version of policy, and it occurred to
> > me: is there any particular reason why there still needs to be a section
> > in policy for "The OSF/Motif and OpenMotif libraries"? It defines the
> > circ
* Russ Allbery , 2011-04-07, 10:49:
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 91173a5..9b4a93e 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -9370,41 +9370,6 @@ name ["syshostname"]:
policy (such as for ).
-
-
- The OSF/Motif and OpenMotif librari
Justin B Rye writes:
> I was just looking at the incoming version of policy, and it occurred to
> me: is there any particular reason why there still needs to be a section
> in policy for "The OSF/Motif and OpenMotif libraries"? It defines the
> circumstances under which packages compiled against
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.2.0
Severity: wishlist
I was just looking at the incoming version of policy, and it occurred
to me: is there any particular reason why there still needs to be a
section in policy for "The OSF/Motif and OpenMotif libraries"? It
defines the circumstances under wh
6 matches
Mail list logo
