Reported bug #617973 against libc6-dev yesterday. The bug has been
reported fixed in libc6-dev 2.13-0exp4 in experimental. If this reaches
unstable and udev will be rebuilt, it should get udev working on hppa.
--
Meelis Roos (mr...@linux.ee)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
> > strace shows the problem to be
> > socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 15) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
> > argument)
> >
> > This looks a fine socket call and SOCK_CLOEXEC should not be a problem with
> > current kernels but for some reason udev still fails with it.
> Actually it's the kerne
On Mar 12, Meelis Roos wrote:
> udev 164 worked fine on my system with both 2.6.32 Debian package and custom
> 2.6.38-rc-something. Upgrading Debian unstable to udev 166 and linux
> 2.6.37-2-parisc64-smp breaks the boot with both Debian 2.6.37 and custom
> kernels that worked before.
Please look
Package: udev
Version: 166-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
udev 164 worked fine on my system with both 2.6.32 Debian package and custom
2.6.38-rc-something. Upgrading Debian unstable to udev 166 and linux
2.6.37-2-parisc64-smp breaks the boot with both Debian 2.6.37 an
4 matches
Mail list logo
