Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Mon, 09, Jan, 2012 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler spoke thus.. > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 PM, peter green wrote: > > armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things > > left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89% > > of the arc

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 PM, peter green wrote: > armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things > left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89% > of the archive (placing it between kfreebsd and ia64) with about 99.5% up to > date (placin

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 05:04 +, peter green wrote: > > > > An initial push of packages to testing occurred with tonight's britney > > run. There's a certain amount of uninstallability and loads of missing > > packages still, but it's a start :) > > > I guess the next step is to try and get i

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

An initial push of packages to testing occurred with tonight's britney run. There's a certain amount of uninstallability and loads of missing packages still, but it's a start :) I guess the next step is to try and get it to the point where it is bootstrapable. When I tried to bootstrap it

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I had been planning on having a look at the situation for both armhf and > s390x over the period between Christmas and New Year, but for a variety > of reasons that never happened. It's still on my short-term to-do list; > it's not quite

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:24 AM, peter green wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of >>> which have a number of other packages directly or indir

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:41:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > FYI, we are considering making 1.9.X the default version of Ruby in > wheezy. It scares me a bit that you want to include armhf in testing > when ruby1.9.1 doesn't build on armhf because the test suite segfaults > (#652674). We are

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On 04.01.2012 07:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/01/12 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck behind them). Hi, FYI, we are considering making 1.9.X the defa

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On 03/01/12 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of > which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck > behind them). Hi, FYI, we are considering making 1.9.X the default version of Ruby in wheezy. It scares

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck behind them). ahh... webkit. do you have a system anyw

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >  anything outside of that - even by a marginal amount - will result in > the build machine absolutely thrashing its nuts off. [for anything in excess of 24 hours]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > (fwiw, the not-yet-built list includes webkit and ruby1.9.1, each of > which have a number of other packages directly or indirectly stuck > behind them). ahh... webkit. do you have a system anywhere that has 2gb of RAM? if not, i strong

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 22:00 +, peter green wrote: > armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things > left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround > 89% of the archive (placing it between kfreebsd and ia64) with about > 99.5% up to date (pl

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

armhf has now pretty much cleared the needs-build queue (the only things left are non-free stuff and recently added stuff) and has built arround 89% of the archive (placing it between kfreebsd and ia64) with about 99.5% up to date (placing it between amd64 and i386). Would now be a good time to

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

reassign 615513 release.debian.org thanks armhf support has been added into dak, and archive now ships the architecture. Reassigning back to release.debian.org to let the Release Team to handle the issue from now on. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

Hello, 2011/11/22 Mark Hymers : > As discussed with Sledge this afternoon, the syncproxy issue is now > resolved and we're in planing to get the import going. Thanks Mark! Just let me know how, when, what I can do to smooth your work. Cheers, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- .

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Tue, 22, Nov, 2011 at 01:26:28PM +, Hector Oron spoke thus.. > Hello Mark, > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 07:52:46AM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote: > > > Just a note on this so that the bug report is up-to-date - the armhf > > bootstrapping in the archive is waiting on an updated EU syncproxy > >

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

Hello Mark, On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 07:52:46AM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote: > Just a note on this so that the bug report is up-to-date - the armhf > bootstrapping in the archive is waiting on an updated EU syncproxy > machine as we're out of disk space. Has the status been updated? Is there an

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Sun, 27, Mar, 2011 at 04:53:06PM +0100, Hector Oron spoke thus.. > Please note a wiki page has started to meet archive criteria: > Just a note on this so that the bug report is up-to-date - the armhf bootstrapping in the archive is waiting o

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

Hi, 2011/3/26 Mark Hymers : > So after some discussion, the ftp team has accepted that the armhf port > should be considered for inclusion and looking at debian-ports.org, > ( http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/graph-week-big.png ) you seem to > have just around 87.5% of the archive built which

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

On Sun, 27, Feb, 2011 at 02:35:26AM +, Hector Oron spoke thus.. > The goal is to release next Debian cycle with ('armhf') support, that > is a release goal, hence related to release team. Hi, So after some discussion, the ftp team has accepted that the armhf port should be considered for incl

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

Hello, 2011/2/27 Julien Cristau : > What does this have to do with the release team?  We don't run the > archive... The goal is to release next Debian cycle with ('armhf') support, that is a release goal, hence related to release team. Cheers, --  Héctor Orón "Our Sun unleashes tremendous fla

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

reassign 615513 ftp.debian.org kthxbye On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 02:11:07 +, Hector Oron wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > I would like to propose inclusion of Debian ARM for hard float port > ('armhf') into Debian main archive as a release goal. Wha

Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive

Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hello, I would like to propose inclusion of Debian ARM for hard float port ('armhf') into Debian main archive as a release goal. ARM for hard float porters will add bug blockers to this bug to ease release team work. Best regards -- System In