Hi,
On Montag, 7. März 2011, Etienne Millon wrote:
> I'm interested in maintaining the package. However this would be my
> first python package, so I may do a few policy mistakes at first :)
>
> What is the correct way to take over the package ? Only change the
> Maintainer field and add a new cha
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (Not only) considering it's your first package (or first python package?), I
> would suggest you and David maintain the package together?
I am currently adopting zsnes (assembly + C, packaged using debhelper)
as part of the debian g
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 06:00:33PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> David has not responded in 7 days and the package looks largely
> unmaintained.
>
> If you are still interested, would you consider packaging 2.70 and
> taking over the package?
Hello,
Sorry for the delay.
I'm interested in main
also sprach Etienne Millon [2011.02.23.1015 +0100]:
> (I'm the one who uploaded 2.69 to mentors and tagged those bugs)
>
> I thought that David was MIA and took the initiative to prepare a new
> version. As 2.69 will probably not hit the archive, I'm untagging the
> bugs. For the record, I have b
tags 518410 - pending
tags 447144 - pending
thanks
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:20:32AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Also, 518410 and 447144 are tagged pending, which I think is not really true,
> as new upstream versions should not be introduced with an NMU...
Hello,
(I'm the one who uploaded 2
package: rss2email
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: etienne.mil...@gmail.com
Hi David,
2.70 is out and 2.69 is available on mentors (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447144#35) - what are your
plans for this package?
Also, 518410 and 447144 are tagged pending, which I think
6 matches
Mail list logo
