Hi,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> Yes, we need to finally convert the Debian FAQ from debiandoc to modern
> DocBook
> XML, so that obsolete debiandoc toolchain can get removed.
See also #870820 debiandoc-sgml "Time to declare the package obsolete and
Hi Osamu e.a.,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >
> > Yes, we need to finally convert the Debian FAQ from debiandoc to modern
> > DocBook
> > XML, so that obsolete debiandoc toolchain can get remo
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi Osamu, victory e.a.,
>
> Yes, we need to finally convert the Debian FAQ from debiandoc to modern
> DocBook
> XML, so that obsolete debiandoc toolchain can get removed.
...
I am quite busy with many things. So This is
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:14:54 +0100
Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> I just found out that running "debiandoc2dbk debian-faq.sgml" from within
> an SVN checkout produces pretty neat debian-faq.dbk/*.dbk files. That
> seems to work :)
> victory: I guess that's what you did to produce faq-db5.tbz, right
Hi Osamu, victory e.a.,
Yes, we need to finally convert the Debian FAQ from debiandoc to modern DocBook
XML, so that obsolete debiandoc toolchain can get removed.
I just found out that running "debiandoc2dbk debian-faq.sgml" from within
an SVN checkout produces pretty neat debian-faq.dbk/*.dbk fi
5 matches
Mail list logo
