Bug#606712: can't deal with "_" in domain names

2010-12-12 Thread jidanni
> "PS" == Paul Slootman writes: PS> IDN URLs are encoded in such a way as to be legal, i.e. no _ or other PS> forbidden bytes, i know, punycode. Maybe Andrew could let a few extra wetback characters through, if it won't break anything(?)... perhaps optionally via the .conf file. -- To UNSU

Bug#606712: can't deal with "_" in domain names

2010-12-12 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 12 Dec 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > But as one can now even have Chinese URLs, perhaps the _ could be allowed. IDN URLs are encoded in such a way as to be legal, i.e. no _ or other forbidden bytes, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Bug#606712: can't deal with "_" in domain names

2010-12-11 Thread jidanni
> "PS" == Paul Slootman writes: PS> On Sat 11 Dec 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: >> >> I don't know if "_" in domain names are legal or not, but the perfectly PS> They're not. Perhaps an error message could say so, instead of truncating it and trying to get "w". But as one can now even h

Bug#606712: can't deal with "_" in domain names

2010-12-11 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sat 11 Dec 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > I don't know if "_" in domain names are legal or not, but the perfectly They're not. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#606712: can't deal with "_" in domain names

2010-12-10 Thread jidanni
X-debbugs-Cc: a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk, wwwoffle-us...@gedanken.demon.co.uk Package: wwwoffle Version: 2.9f-2.2 I don't know if "_" in domain names are legal or not, but the perfectly good website http://w_awakening.womenweb.org.tw/ as mentioned on http://www.facebook.com/pages/tai-bei-shi-fu-nu-