Bug#604955:

Thanks for your rapid response! -- Angel Abad angela...@gmail.com | angela...@ubuntu.com | angela...@fsfe.org http://www.pastelero.net FPR: EBF6 080D 59D4 008A DF47  00D4 098D AE47 EE3B C279 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#604955:

* Angel Abad wrote: > I forgot to say that the 0.9-1 revision still FTBFS with binutils-gold. No problem, I'm building now and should have this uploaded in just a sec. Thanks! -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#604955:

I forgot to say that the 0.9-1 revision still FTBFS with binutils-gold. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#604955:

I think this patch is best option to solve this problem. Thanks! -- Angel Abad angela...@gmail.com | angela...@ubuntu.com | angela...@fsfe.org http://www.pastelero.net FPR: EBF6 080D 59D4 008A DF47  00D4 098D AE47 EE3B C279 0003-Fix-ftbfs-with-binutils-gold.patch Description: application/octet

Bug#604955: ust: FTBFS with binutils-gold

Package: ust Tags: patch Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch Severity: important Hello dear maintainer Regarding the above subject, Your package FTBFS on ubuntu due to indirect linking cf: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ust/0.8-1/+build/2050578/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.us