Hi there,
I heard that the situation might have changed a bit and that we may be
able to move forward on this package now?
In the interim (since my initial mail offering to update in Debian), the
package has been put into Ubuntu without major issues. I believe the
situation is now stable enough t
On 11-09-30 06:29 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> This “ideal of perfection” only requires someone to stick his fingers
> out of his ass and actually do the work.
Message #12 offered to do that and in Message 19 you told him not to do
that. I sure got the impression from your tone that there was
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011 à 16:37 -0400, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
> And so, while we wait for perfection, instead of having functional we
> accept completely broken? And we prefer completely broken to functional
> simply because functional is not "perfect"? Seems to me that completely
> br
Le vendredi 30 septembre 2011 à 07:04 -0400, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
> On 11-09-30 06:29 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> > This “ideal of perfection” only requires someone to stick his fingers
> > out of his ass and actually do the work.
>
> Message #12 offered to do that and in Message 19
On 11-09-30 07:06 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> Message #12 offered to update libproxy to 0.4, which would make things
> worse.
Maybe you'd care to explain how. I am running 0.4.7 here on my Ubuntu
system and it works a heck of a lot better than 0.3.1 did. Have you
brought up your issues with
On 37-01--10 02:59 PM, wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 septembre 2011 à 17:59 +0100, Iain Lane a écrit :
>> I've been working recently on upgrading libproxy to 0.47, the latest
>> upstream.
>
> Seriously, don’t do that.
>
> The 0.3 series was already broken, and the 0.4 one is even worse. They
> reimplem
Le jeudi 22 septembre 2011 à 17:59 +0100, Iain Lane a écrit :
> I've been working recently on upgrading libproxy to 0.47, the latest
> upstream.
Seriously, don’t do that.
The 0.3 series was already broken, and the 0.4 one is even worse. They
reimplemented again a non-standards-compliant HTTP pa
retitle 604394 Upgrade to 0.4 series
thanks
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:39:32PM +0100, Artur Rona wrote:
> Package: libproxy
> Version: 0.3.1-2
>
> Please upgrade libproxy to latest upstream version (ATM is 0.46).
> Current version is out-of-dated.
I've been working recently on upgrading libproxy
Package: libproxy
Version: 0.3.1-2
Please upgrade libproxy to latest upstream version (ATM is 0.46).
Current version is out-of-dated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
9 matches
Mail list logo
