On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:05 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Monday 06 December 2010 12:29:58 you wrote:
> > > At least I would try it, as I'm able to powercycle the box, if there is
> > > any problem.
> > > If the squeeze kernel doesn't work, maybe a patch against 2.6.32-28 could
> > > b
Hi Ian,
On Monday 06 December 2010 11:10:40 Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:57 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > On Friday, 3. December 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It is probably filtered out of syslog because it has a low priority
> > > level. 'dmesg' should show you all the kerne
retitle 602109 xen: dom0: ACPI crash in xen_acpi_processor_add
thanks
Hi Jan,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:57 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
>
> On Friday, 3. December 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It is probably filtered out of syslog because it has a low priority
> > level. 'dmesg' should show you all
Hi Ben,
On Samstag, 4. Dezember 2010, you wrote:
> Module loading is serialised by a lock. Because the 'oops' occurs
> during module loading, the locks is never released and no more modules
> can be loaded. So we don't need to worry about that - it's just a
> symptom of the initial 'oops'.
>
>
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:57 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Friday, 3. December 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It is probably filtered out of syslog because it has a low priority
> > level. 'dmesg' should show you all the kernel log buffer.
>
> attached you can find the corresponding p
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 12:33 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> On Friday 03 December 2010 06:29:56 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > Please can you log information about the state of tasks by running:
> >
> > echo t >
Hi Ben,
thanks for your reply.
On Friday 03 December 2010 06:29:56 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Please can you log information about the state of tasks by running:
>
> echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> then send the messages for the modprobe tasks
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 22:00 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> today I updated to linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-686 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 and
> recognized that I have a couple of modprobe processes still running after
> booting:
[...]
Please can you log information about the state of tasks by
Hi there,
today I updated to linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-686 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 and
recognized that I have a couple of modprobe processes still running after
booting:
root 966 0.2 0.0 2308 800 ?S
9 matches
Mail list logo
