On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:12:25 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > I guess this is one of the cornercases where we have to sacrifice
> > an improvement in a small corner in order to improve the larger good
> > (i.e. get out the release without unnecessary delays and risk for the
> > quality).
> What are
On 11/01/2010 01:21 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> JFTR: bti would already (build-)depend on it if it had been around
> longer :)
>
Sure :)
> (In fact I have a package ready with the new upstream release of bti
> which uses liboauth).
>
>>> libOAuth was accepted very recently into Debian Unst
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:51:13 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Without this package, BTI and other twitter clients will not function in
> > squeeze, as they would not be able
> > to authenticate with Twitter.
> While this appears to be useful for Twitter clients (those actually
> using the lib), the
On 0, Bilal Akhtar wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package liboauth
>
> This package is blocking major bugs in twitter clients, an example of such a
> bug is bug #588235 .
> Twitter r
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package liboauth
This package is blocking major bugs in twitter clients, an example of such a
bug is bug #588235 .
Twitter recently dropped support for Basic Auth and now al
5 matches
Mail list logo
