Bug#600712: Debugging hints

2010-12-23 Thread Pierre Crescenzo
Hello, > 1. Do you get a backtrace in Emacs if you seet (setq debug-on-error >t)? (unlikely) > > 2. If you turn up gnus-verbose and gnus-verbose-backends, do you get >useful information? Sorry... The result is only: pie...@tpol:~$ emacs Fatal error (11)Erreur de segmentation And I can't

Bug#600712: Debugging hints

2010-12-23 Thread Pierre Crescenzo
Hello, > 1. Do you get a backtrace in Emacs if you seet (setq debug-on-error >t)? (unlikely) OK. I'll try that. > 2. If you turn up gnus-verbose and gnus-verbose-backends, do you get >useful information? OK. I'll try that. > 3. Can you build Emacs with debugging symbols and obtain a st

Bug#600712: Debugging hints

2010-12-23 Thread era eriksson
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:19 +0100, "Sven Joachim" wrote: > It is not very likely that the submitter will reply, since he will most > probably not have seen your message. You need to CC him. That seems backwards, but I have forwarded my message to him under separate cover. Thanks for the heads-up.

Bug#600712: Debugging hints

2010-12-23 Thread Sven Joachim
It is not very likely that the submitter will reply, since he will most probably not have seen your message. You need to CC him. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.

Bug#600712: Debugging hints

2010-12-22 Thread era eriksson
1. Do you get a backtrace in Emacs if you seet (setq debug-on-error t)? (unlikely) 2. If you turn up gnus-verbose and gnus-verbose-backends, do you get useful information? 3. Can you build Emacs with debugging symbols and obtain a stack trace? /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it wo