On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:27:08PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:31:26PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:13:36PM +0200, TomaszN wrote:
> > > It would be great if I could limit execution to e.g. 0.3 seconds.
> > > Instead alarm(), set timer wit
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:31:26PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:13:36PM +0200, TomaszN wrote:
> > It would be great if I could limit execution to e.g. 0.3 seconds.
> > Instead alarm(), set timer with setitimer().
>
> Good idea, thanks! I'll see what I can do.
>
> Tha
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:13:36PM +0200, TomaszN wrote:
> It would be great if I could limit execution to e.g. 0.3 seconds.
> Instead alarm(), set timer with setitimer().
Good idea, thanks! I'll see what I can do.
Thanks for taking an interest in timelimit, too :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pent
Package: timelimit
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
It would be great if I could limit execution to e.g. 0.3 seconds. Instead
alarm(), set timer with setitimer().
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
4 matches
Mail list logo