> Subject: Re: Bug#596862: xpdf-common: please provide a transitional package
> To: 596862-cl...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc: cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:46:12 -0400
>
> tag 596862 wontfix
> thanks
>
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:27:43 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
&g
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:31:33PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>...
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:22:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:15:19PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> >> I guess there is something wrong with the transition from
> >> xpdf-[common|reader|utils] to xpdf. Inde
Hi there!
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:30:34 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:49:33 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
[why I think the situation like it is is broken]
> i understand your perspective. however, i personally don't see a
> problem. i am willing to accept a patch as long is
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:15:19PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Package: xpdf
> Version: 3.02-10
> Severity: important
>
> Hi there!
>
> I guess there is something wrong with the transition from
> xpdf-[common|reader|utils] to xpdf. Indeed, both xpdf-reader and
> xpdf-utils have an appropriate d
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:49:33 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:58:47 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > severity 596862 minor
>
> I do not agree with this severity, but it is your package, thus your
> choice.
>
> > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:15:19 +0200 Luca Capello wr
Hi there!
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:58:47 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> severity 596862 minor
I do not agree with this severity, but it is your package, thus your
choice.
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:15:19 +0200 Luca Capello wrote:
>> A lenny user who installed the xpdf-reader package and *not* the o
severity 596862 minor
thanks
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:15:19 +0200 Luca Capello wrote:
> Package: xpdf
> Version: 3.02-10
> Severity: important
>
> Hi there!
>
> I guess there is something wrong with the transition from
> xpdf-[common|reader|utils] to xpdf. Indeed, both xpdf-reader and
> xpdf-uti
Package: xpdf
Version: 3.02-10
Severity: important
Hi there!
I guess there is something wrong with the transition from
xpdf-[common|reader|utils] to xpdf. Indeed, both xpdf-reader and
xpdf-utils have an appropriate dummy transitional package, while
xpdf-common does not. Or, better, it had it, b
8 matches
Mail list logo