Am 22.09.2010 19:30, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 19:06:52 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> What kind of discussion is this here?
>>
> You want a newer version of openmotif in squeeze. I'm trying to
> understand why that's a good thing to do. There are no users of
> openmotif
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 19:06:52 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> What kind of discussion is this here?
>
You want a newer version of openmotif in squeeze. I'm trying to
understand why that's a good thing to do. There are no users of
openmotif in Debian, so I assume there are external users. Which
Am 22.09.2010 18:41, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:33:45 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.09.2010 15:27, Julien Cristau schrieb:
>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:19:11 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>>>
Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> So there's someth
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:33:45 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> Am 22.09.2010 15:27, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:19:11 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> >
> >> Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> >>> So there's something I'm not sure I understand here. AFAIK, we're
Am 22.09.2010 15:27, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:19:11 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb:
>>> So there's something I'm not sure I understand here. AFAIK, we're
>>> shipping motif because some closed apps need it. How does that wo
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:19:11 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> > So there's something I'm not sure I understand here. AFAIK, we're
> > shipping motif because some closed apps need it. How does that work if
> > we get rid of libXm.so.3? Or did I misu
Am 22.09.2010 14:53, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> So there's something I'm not sure I understand here. AFAIK, we're
> shipping motif because some closed apps need it. How does that work if
> we get rid of libXm.so.3? Or did I misunderstand the point of those
> packages?
Apps have to be recompiled
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:08:55 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
> august for the appropriate builds.
>
> This package is mand
Am 21.09.2010 10:42, Mehdi Dogguy schrieb:
> On 09/21/2010 10:20 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>> 13/10 days. But due to no unblocking request, there will be no
>> migration to testing. I hope that get changed soon.
>>
>
> Well, we are not ignoring yet HPPA… so, you'll have to wait a bit longer
> (hope
On 09/21/2010 10:20 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> 13/10 days. But due to no unblocking request, there will be no
> migration to testing. I hope that get changed soon.
>
Well, we are not ignoring yet HPPA… so, you'll have to wait a bit longer
(hopefully, not much).
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
htt
Am 18.09.2010 23:42, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:55:32 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> whats the status on this hppa build? I want to see openmotif in the
>> current unstable version to be in testing -> stable. I'm not a DD so
>> my hands are tied :/
>>
> hppa out-of-date-
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:55:32 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> whats the status on this hppa build? I want to see openmotif in the
> current unstable version to be in testing -> stable. I'm not a DD so
> my hands are tied :/
>
hppa out-of-date-ness is likely to get ignored by the testing scripts i
Am 11.09.2010 17:12, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 08:43:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
>>> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
tes
Am 11.09.2010 17:12, Julien Cristau schrieb:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 08:43:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>> Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
>>> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
tes
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 08:43:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> > On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> >> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
> >> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm wai
Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
>> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
>> august for the appropriate builds.
>
> out
Am 04.09.2010 18:13, Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
>> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
>> august for the appropriate builds.
>
> out
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:08 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
> testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
> august for the appropriate builds.
out of date on hppa: libmotif-dev, libmotif3, motif-clients
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: release.debian.org
Please add another freeze exception. The package would have been in
testing already but the buldd's are too busy. I'm waiting since 19. of
august for the appropriate builds.
This package is mandatory for citrix ICA-client.
19 matches
Mail list logo
