On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
> of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
> over. If I don't hear anythin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes:
>
> > As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
> > without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
> > of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in
Neil McGovern writes:
> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
> of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
> over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
>> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
>> of the depending packages t
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
> of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
> over. If I don't h
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
from testing.
Ne
6 matches
Mail list logo
