On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:09, Christian Kastner wrote:
> There seems to be a misunderstanding here.
Indeed. Sorry & thanks for the clarification.
> [1] http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/764#comment:2
On to the next round. Yay?
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
reopen 588588
thanks
On 05/12/2011 10:59 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> According to Mister_X in #aircrack-ng on freenode, aircrack-ng never
> took any code from Pyrite, it was the other way round. Closing.
There seems to be a misunderstanding here. The issue wasn't aircrack-ng
taking code from Py
According to Mister_X in #aircrack-ng on freenode, aircrack-ng never
took any code from Pyrite, it was the other way round. Closing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re-re-re-poking them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:12:28PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 17:00, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > Alvaro confirmed GPL:
>
> If he is OK with both 2 & 3, can you ask him if GPL 2+ is OK, as well?
Any progress on this?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
T
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:12:28PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 17:00, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > Alvaro confirmed GPL:
>
> If he is OK with both 2 & 3, can you ask him if GPL 2+ is OK, as well?
Alvaro,
thanks for your previous mail on the matter of the license o
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 17:00, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Alvaro confirmed GPL:
If he is OK with both 2 & 3, can you ask him if GPL 2+ is OK, as well?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:42:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:40, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > I've contacted the authors.
>
> Sorry, I was on the road; just came back and am churning through email
> atm.
>
> Did you reach anyone? I poked repeatedly, but did n
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:40, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I've contacted the authors.
Sorry, I was on the road; just came back and am churning through email
atm.
Did you reach anyone? I poked repeatedly, but did not get a reply.
Thanks for not forgetting this and sorry that I did not get any
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:34:03PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:26, Adam D. Barratt
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Any news on that?
> >
> > I gave up poking at some point. Let me renew that effort :)
>
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:34:03PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:26, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
>
> > Any news on that?
>
> I gave up poking at some point. Let me renew that effort :)
>
> Thanks for reminding me!
Let me remind you again :-)
Cheers,
Moritz
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Any news on that?
I gave up poking at some point. Let me renew that effort :)
Thanks for reminding me!
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> I just made aircrack-ng aware of the updates, let's see if we can
> squash one more RC bug :)
Any news on that?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
I just made aircrack-ng aware of the updates, let's see if we can
squash one more RC bug :)
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> upstream
>
> The authors are:
>
> // SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
> (napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
> // SHA-1 MMX implementation, (C) 2005 Simon Marechal (si...@banquise.net)
>
> Missing licen
On 07/19/2010 09:15 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Can't these packages use libcrypto (not gpl-compatible, so maybe not the
> best idea in all cases) or libgcrypt or some other crypto library
> instead of having their own sha1 implementations?
Pyrit falls back to libcrypto when the SSE2 implementatio
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 20:59:47 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> >> The authors are:
> >>
> >> // SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
> >> (napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
> >> // SHA
Hi,
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>> The authors are:
>>
>> // SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
>> (napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
>> // SHA-1 MMX implementation, (C) 2005 Simon Marechal (si...@banquise.net)
>>
>> Missing
Hi!
* Richard Hartmann [100716 21:18]:
> The authors are:
>
> // SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
> (napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
> // SHA-1 MMX implementation, (C) 2005 Simon Marechal (si...@banquise.net)
>
> Missing licence has been forwarded t
upstream
The authors are:
// SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
(napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
// SHA-1 MMX implementation, (C) 2005 Simon Marechal (si...@banquise.net)
Missing licence has been forwarded to upstream, see [1]
for details
Richard
[1]
20 matches
Mail list logo
