Bug#588382: your mail

2010-09-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 588382 + pending thanks On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:28:06AM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > (haven't tested it yet though) Seems to work. evince at least doesn' complain about the xref table anymore :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http:/

Bug#588382: your mail

2010-09-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:28:06AM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:45 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > so this probably is the same as #594275 (and thus > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812) > > Note that the referenced bug report now has a fix for th

Bug#588382: your mail

2010-09-22 Thread Arthur de Jong
tags 588382 + patch thanks On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:45 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > so this probably is the same as #594275 (and thus > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812) Note that the referenced bug report now has a fix for this: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ooo-build/ooo-build

Bug#588382: your mail

2010-08-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
forwarded 588382 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812 merge 588382 594275 thanks Hi, On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 07:12:12PM -0700, Alex Hvostov wrote: > I should also mention that, when trying to read a PDF generated by > Debian OOo, GNOME's Evince program complains: > > > $ evince fo

Bug#588382:

2010-07-31 Thread Alex Hvostov
I should also mention that, when trying to read a PDF generated by Debian OOo, GNOME's Evince program complains: > $ evince foo.pdf > Error: PDF file is damaged - attempting to reconstruct xref table... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#588382:

2010-07-31 Thread Alex Hvostov
I ran into this problem too, so I did a little testing. The Windows Go-OO build has the same problem, but the Oracle build doesn't! Go-OO claims that Debian uses them as an upstream, rather than vanilla OOo. If this is correct, then it appears that this bug was introduced by Go-OO. Hope this hel

Bug#588382: openoffice.org debs are ok

2010-07-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:38:58AM +0200, gark...@mailueberfall.de wrote: > I checked the "official" deb packages from openoffice.org and they don't Upstream has no "packages". They have "content put into something formatted like a deb package". They don't even have the most trivial dependencies.

Bug#588382: openoffice.org debs are ok

2010-07-08 Thread garkein
I checked the "official" deb packages from openoffice.org and they don't show the bug. So it looks like the Debian build introduced this regression bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Bug#588382: openoffice.org: Since 3.2.1, exported PDF documents don't contain in-document hyperlinks anymore

2010-07-07 Thread Daniel
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:3.2.1-3 Severity: normal This bug is a regression bug. Since this version (3.2.1), exported PDF documents (in Tagged-PDF mode) don't contain in-document hyperlinks anymore, such as entries of a table of documents that are created as hyperlinks. When exported as